“These boxers, they’re really bad. Especially the tops we got now. Just soft straight up. Yeah, I call them all really soft,” Bradley said on his channel.
“You don’t know how to negotiate. You don’t want to fight. All these damn excuses, man. None of you are perfect. Not one.
“The only one might be Shock (O’Shaquie Foster). Shock might be the only one because he’s not a brother-in-law in any damn body.”
Foster has repeatedly expressed interest in facing Shakur Stevenson and previously indicated he would be willing to move up in weight to make the fight happen. Stevenson, meanwhile, has recently been linked to possible bouts against Devin Haney and Conor Benn, while weight restrictions have become a recurring topic when discussions of bigger opponents come up.
Bradley went on to question several of the sport’s biggest names and the obstacles that stand in the way of big fights.
“You got Devin Haney. He’s scared to death of goddamn Ryan Garcia. He’s also scared to death of Shakur. That’s the reason why he won’t even falter at a goddamn weight,” Bradley said.
“Shakur, we know you don’t wanna get in the damn ring with no damn Haney. You’re scared of his ass, too. You know what I mean? You were scared of all that weight he’s gonna put on after the damn weigh-in.
“And Keyshawn, you were scared to fight Del Santos. See, I’m telling you, every last one of these guys has some flaws in their damn game. They were scared to death of certain fights.”
Bradley closed by returning to Foster, who he believes deserves credit for his willingness to face anyone available.
“Shaka Laka. Shaka Laka. He wants all the smoke. He’s willing to go to 140, 135, whatever.
“Shaka Laka, he’s a real one. That’s the reason why I’m after this, because Shak is a real one. He wants all the smoke.”
Foster has campaigned at both 130 and 135 pounds throughout his career and has openly pursued a matchup with Shakur for years. While Bradley spread criticism over several of boxing’s biggest names, Foster was the one fighter he singled out as ready to take on all comers.
