Hackett outlined his position as he spoke MillCity Boxingand says negotiations must reflect what Stevenson would give up by crossing the Atlantic. “If Shakur takes a risk and fights him in the UK, I’m talking business. You’ve got to give him something,” Hackett said, adding that the rehydration limit is the only protection he’s asking for in return. His position is firm. If Benn’s side refuses, Stevenson should be willing to walk away.
The coach elaborated on the practical concerns behind the request. “When I get there, the only thing I want is the rehydration clause,” Hackett said. “You’re giving him so much in negotiations with benefits by fighting him in the UK. You’re giving away a lot. All I’m asking for is a rehydration clause.”
Hackett believes that limiting how much weight Benn can add after the weigh-in is a reasonable measure to guard against size and strength differences that could otherwise decide the fight before skill comes into play.
Some fans and critics questioned the request, arguing that Stevenson should not seek contractual weight restrictions if he wants to test himself against an obviously bigger opponent. The criticism centers on the belief that a fight with Benn should be taken without conditions, with supporters of that view pointing to champions who have accepted unfavorable conditions and still won.
Hackett addressed that criticism directly, drawing a comparison that underscores his thinking. “Shakur is not Bud,” he said, referring to Terence Crawford. “He’s a great fighter, but he’s not Bud mentally.” The comment reflects Hackett’s view that fighters approach risk and negotiation differently, even at the highest level.
Hackett’s defense of the clause rests on leverage, not hesitation. Stevenson would be entering hostile territory against a bigger opponent, and asking for one contractual concession is considered a fair trade by his team. If Benn isn’t willing to agree, the fight probably ends there.
