Indiathe decision to introduce Harshit Rana as a substitute for the concussion for Shivam Dube Against the fourth T20I English in Pun Caused a great controversy in the cricket world.
Disputes over inclusion of Harshit Rana as a concussion
As in the match, 34 balls of 34 balls, smashing 34 balls, 34 balls, smashing 53 balls, smashing 53 balls, as India determines a competitive total. However, in the final of the shots of India, Dube was shot with helmet Craig Overton Bouncer forces him to leave the field under the protocols. India replaced it in an action since the weighted severe check Harshit RanaThoroughly a thorough thing instead of a medium speed bowler.
Rana, T20I debuted 33 to 33 surrendered to 3. Its important improvements – including Liam Livingstone, Jacob Bethell and Craig Overton – India Bowl helped in the 166th in the UK, which provides 15 people working victories. With this victory, India took the lead 3-1 in a row before the final match in Mumbai. England Captain Jos Buttler It openly stated that Rana did not change a similar substitute for DUBE did not question India’s action.
Ravichandran Ashwin’s position on India’s decision
The legend of Indian spin Ravichandran ashwin He now criticizes both match officials and the management of the Indian team, and expressed strong rejection of the decision. Speaking on the YouTube channel, Ashwin, more than international cricket adjustment, compared to the IPL’s decision to influence the player’s order did not make his words.
“The game is made. Ashwin, expressed his inconvenience to the situation.
Later, Yuzvendra replaced Jadeja after replacing Chahahal’s Chahahal Ravindra Jadeja, and he had a shock. Ashwin, at least, a spinner in this situation was replaced by another spinner, it made a reasonable decision. In contrast, the Dove seemed completely unfounded by bringing a pacer for a thorough hook.
“All the discussion, Harshit Rana’s Shivam Dube was a concentration for Dube. Shivam was an international match and play an IPL match? I can understand. Ravindra won the consulator in Canberra came as a substitute. I don’t understand it. At least before, Chahhal came for Jadeja with a spinner for a spinner “ 38-year-old 38 year old.
Read: India, during the 4th T20I against England, Harshit Rana and Shivam was watching the ICC rules when changing the Dube? Explained
Ashwin’s perspective Singh Singh as a possible change
Ashwin, as a strictly criticizing the match authorities, argued that Ramandaep SinghA comprehensive stick was a similar substitute similar to the Dube, it’s still out of attention. Ashwin has set a dangerous precedent of this decision, because the teams can allow the rules of shaking in future matches, he stressed that this decision has set a dangerous precedent.
“Harshit came to Shivam Dube. If there is no role in the team, Harshit Rana can pack a little bat and Shivam Dube. That’s why we brought it in. Changer change Ramandeep Singh was sitting outside. I do not understand. Ramandeep Singh was the right settlement. However, Harshit Rana was chosen as a substitute. I think the people should look at it “ The ashvin is over.
