In the world of cricket, team dynamics and selection processes often generate intense debate and controversy. One such incident that has resurfaced is a shocking exception Ambati Rayudu from India‘s 2019 ODI World Cup squad.
Former cricketer Robin Uthappa has reignited these debates by suggesting that the decision was affected Virat Kohlipersonal preference rather than purely cricketing reasons. This revelation not only sheds light on the complexity of team selection, but also raises questions about leadership styles in sports.
Controversial dismissal of Ambati Rayudu
Rayudu, who had been a reliable performer until the World Cup, was unexpectedly dropped from the final squad before the start of the tournament. He had featured in ten ODIs before the World Cup, making his exclusion all the more baffling. Uthappa stated that Kohli’s personal feelings towards the players played a significant role in his selection decisions, stating that Kohli was likely to be dropped from the team if he did not favor a player.
” If he (Virat Kohli) did not like someone, if he did not feel that someone was good, then he was cut. (Ambati) Rayudu is the best example. In an interview with Lallantop, Uthappa expressed his displeasure with the way Rayudu was treated at such an important point in his career.
Also READ: RCB gives an update on Virat Kohli’s potential leadership in IPL 2025
Virat Kohli has left a player in limbo
Uthappa’s comments highlight a wider problem in team sports: for players on the brink of selection, the emotional toll should only be thrown at the last minute. Rayudu had prepared for the World Cup with equipment and kit at home, believing that he would represent India on cricket’s biggest stage.
Uthappa regretted this situation and added: “You feel bad. Everyone has their preferences, I agree, but once you get the player to the top, you can’t close the door. His World Cup outfit, World Cup bag, everything was at home. A football player would think he was going to the World Cup. But you closed the door in his face.”
Out-of-selection effects
The aftermath of Rayudu’s dismissal went beyond just one player’s frustration. This led to a wide debate about selection politics and transparency in the Indian cricket system. After his release, Rayudu made his disappointment public and even hinted at problems with the then chief selector. CEC Prasad. Prasad claimed that the choices were made collectively, but admitted that Kohli was involved in those decisions.
Moreover, Uthappa’s comments touch on another controversial topic: How is Kohli’s treatment of players? Yuvraj Singh affected their careers. Uthappa suggested a pattern of favoritism that could undermine team morale and unity, alleging that Kohli’s influence contributed to Yuvraj’s premature retirement from international cricket following his battle with cancer.
