Research shows a 3.6% improvement in the current economy
Recently released Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 promises to improve the economy and, in turn, helps you push you the best of the best.
Although all brands will make these requirements, Amherst, the new marathon shoe, tested the study of Massachusetts University, and found it to be improved by 3.6%. This overcomes 1 to 1.5% of improvement plateau from the beginning of “Super Shoes” since the beginning of “Super Shoes”.
The four Super Shoes models have been tested by Wouter Hoogkamer and his team in Ums Amerst.
“From outside, Puma Fast-R3 is another advanced boot technology shoe,” says Wouter hoogkamerAssistant of Kinefishology, Ums Amherst, Senior Paper and Director of Umil Integration Laboratory (UMIL). “But Puma mixed the ingredients so that it is a significant step.” He notes that the only time he has seen effective results on effective results when he first got acquainted with the current world.
For this study, by Puma, Hocku and his team, evaluating the four AFT model running economy without further involving PUMA.
“Economy is mainly equivalent to the gas run of your car,” explains Hoogkamer, adding that some cars can drive more miles. “If I get out there and run a 7-minute miles pace, I would use a certain amount of energy. If I have been training for years, I will use less energy. “
However, in 2016, the marathon run changed when Nike introduced the first FOOT FOOTWEAR. Hoogkamer’s previous work It turned out that this design improves the driving economy by 4%, in fact bypassing the years of courses, simply exchanging shoes.
These days are consistent in the Marathon area, and Hokkinds say that on average, there is a 1% difference between different shrimp. “Recently, we have not seen huge improvements, which in the field forced everyone to think that we had achieved this plateau,” he said. “And that’s what we thought, until Perma sent us this shoe.”
Puma Quick-R Nitro Elite 3:
They found out that Puma Prototype was 3.15% and more economically more economically than other popular Aft models. “These are significant differences,” says Hoghkerich. “You talk about the minutes of the marathon, and I train for years to shave a minute of my time.”
Consider the performance of Edna Kiplagat in Kenya’s professional intercity run in the Boston Marathon. He finished the third place 2:23:21. 3.15% of the improvement of the economy will allow him to complete 2:20:13, more than 2 minutes more quickly than the winning time.
Monty Bertschy, Umlum Umias and Research Assistant Doctoral Candidate explains that the improvement of the economy is usually small or contradicts compared to the attacks between the participants.
“On average, we usually see different differences between 1 and 2%, but that’s averaging some people, and some people don’t respond very well,” he said. “Nevertheless, we see it with this shoe, universal, everyone responds positively to this new shoe argument.” Unlike other comparisons, none of the 15 participants run a worse economy. Even the worst answer was still 1% improving efficiency.
PUMA used a data-based settlement process. Instead of testing shoes, they created a digital version instead of testing it and used data-based finish elements to play with property to see how it saw real legs. This process discovered the optimal placement of foam, the material properties of carbon fibers and the total geometry to maximize the maintenance of energy and return the stiffness of the desired carbon plate, which are known for the economy and performance.
“However, it is still a slight gloom, on which we need to have caps higher, but the process is what is a researcher in Umil.
Puma pwrplate
Although FR3 is 80 grams light than the previous Puma model, only weight could not explain this expressed improvement. Using E10000 at Umass Institute of Applied Life SciencesThe research team was able to imitate the peak forces in the shoe and looked some of the foam on the whole bed of half.
Through it, they doubt that the changes in the most meaningful parameters were 3% of energy returns compared to other distance, which means that the shoe is more like trampoline and less like wet sand.
Hoogkamer also notes that this shows the possibility of creating computational optimized shoes. “This shoe has been developed based on the average data of several runners, in a certain range of speed,” he said, but it would have been theoretically possible to install individual work that meet their special needs.
The full report of their finds can be found in the original printing article. The study was funded by Puma and Hoogkamer’s Umill Research Group before received many research grants from Puma and Saucony. Laura Haley, another author of the newspaper, is an employee of Puma. The authors say that the Puma had no effect on the views presented in the article.
