Not too long ago, I wrote A story for increasing mini driver offers And we hope to provide some knowledge if a mini can be right for you.
On the way, I suggested that maybe this, while intriguing, the mini approach may not be ideal for medium players. Most of us can be better served with a full -sized driver cut in more movable lengths (roadwritten wood).
Trying a similar construction, I can tell you that if the narrower shooting is your goal, it works as advertised (as much as the shorter driver buildings are ever advertised).
The general opinion behind these type of construction is that, contrary to what many believe, a 3-drunt is not likely to be more accurate than a driver and while it is best to get away from a road tree, a mini driver will be harder to hit the deck.
That is why a reader called mini driver a The worst of the two worlds solution. Tough, but if you want to read that mini drivers have a limited audience, this is likely to be fair.
Macro> mini
Within this context, it is at least interesting that you will not find a ping between the list of rumored brands that you have a mini driver in the short -term pipeline. This is not to say that Ping does not think it is worth a more controllable leader, but it seems that the company thinks that if you should hit the shots from the deck with any regularity, Keep your 3-Dru. If you don’t, you may want to consider what is sometimes called “an attack”.
Simply, an attacker or what adaptation and performance of Ping VP, Marty JeretsonIt suggests that it can also be called a “macro driver”, it is a full-sized driver head with a cut-cut slope (43.5 inches), 5-droin (43) or even 7-drool (42.5) length.
Jeretson posted the graph below. It provides some key knowledge of who to consider an attractive/macro driver, as well as some data from the ping-based test bases that show comparisons between a shorter driver building and a conventional 3-wood.
The summary version is that … let’s call it a “macro driver”, I like it a lot … hit 10 percent more roads and produced 40 percent stronger distribution than a Ping LST 3-Dru.
Unlike mini drivers, there is no suggestion that the macro driver (I’m staying with it) will work off the deck. At 3-lace length, it will fly up to 3-dru, but you are receiving added control.
As the graph suggests, this makes the macro driver a great opportunity for players who already have a lot of distance, need something more controllable than a driver and if you are going to pull your 3-wood, you are not generally inclined to hit 3-Dru off the deck anyway.
Where to start
The recommended starting point for a macro driver construction is a G440 head with 12 degrees. Ping has a number of shafts supported that allow you to build length 3-, 5- or 7-drat. Apparently, control increases as the axis length decreases.
Like with mini drivers, you may not have a place in your bag for a macro driver, but if you think it can be a good fit for your game, it’s probably worth spending some time with a more convenient.
Make your word
Do you think a macro driver makes more sense than a mini driver? Tell us.
office Never forget the mini. Need a macro driver? first appeared in MygolfSSS.
