“Expect to be served, your pigs!” Jake Paul unleashed advocates to Chavez jr. Win

Jake Paul is working on his victory after the Chavez jr. To make a full -fledged legal spectacle. After improving his record to 12-1 with a boring, clear victory over Julio Cesar Chavez jr. In Anaheim, Paul has no patience left for everyone who calls his rise a joke. Now he and his driver are doing slander threats – and it looks more desperate than predominant.

Paul – Chavez: Is Piers Morgan in trouble?

TV -GasHer Piers Morgan has unleashed two beams on X:

“I had a better battle with Jake Paul on Thursday than the unconscious farce that took place tonight.”
“The man lays his bags with $$$ buckets – but he kills boxing with these tedious increased bulls *** against older fighters past their lead.”

A few days before, Paul sat down on Piers Morgan Uncensored – just to mark the anchor a ‘fat a **’ before dramatically ending the interview.

Jake Paul’s legal threats to Chavez jr. Victory

“After years of the fact that it’s just” haters to be haters “, I asked my team to go vigorously behind everyone who makes lies about my boxing career. Expect you to serve pigs, ‘Snore Paul on social media.

Manager Nakisa Bidarian has piled up with even stricter language:

‘This claim is unfounded and irresponsible. Last night’s fight against Chavez jr. Was a fully approved 10-round Cruiserweight attack, hosted by the California State Athletics Commission with official judges. No stage / rig – just hard work and a legitimate victory. To say otherwise, not only undermines the integrity of the sport, but is defamatory and causes reputation damage to MVP, Jake Paul and the commission. Enough is enough. We will investigate all options, including legal action, to be liable for those who spread such deliberate and harmful lies. ‘

Now even podcasters and bloggers sweat. Is Paul’s team found every tweet, post and article that dares to question his legitimacy? They warned against summonses, deposits and damage claims that could bury small outlets in legal costs.

The slander drill: What Paul has to prove

In terms of the California Act, a plaintiff must show a plaintiff in a defamatory case that the statement in question:

1. Has transferred an alleged fact (not pure opinion)

2. Which

3. Have been published to others

4. Did reputation damage

Since Jake Paul is a public figure, he also stands before the ‘real malice’ standard -he must prove that critics either knew that their statements were false, or acted with reckless disregard for the truth, which requires a clear evidence that defendants entertain serious doubts about their comments.

It’s hard to see it as something other than a PR panic. Instead of talking, Paul is raising his lawyers. Will this legal blitz silence the critics or just strengthen the spectacle? One thing is certain: Jake Paul’s next fight may not be in the ring – but in a courtroom. ‘Haters’, considered yourselves warned.