Canelo Alvarez fired on social media on Jake Paul and responded to the fact that he was owned as a ‘slave’ after sponsoring in May from their mega battle and signing a four-match agreement with Turki Al-Sheikh. Canelo said he was just fighting “real fighters ” And Paul rejected as a ‘YouTuber’.
‘Real fighters’ debate
Jake pointed out that Canelo’s battles “Lose money“And that he needs him to be involved in the ‘biggest battle of 2025.’ Turki admitted that he did not match the offer that Canelo would have received if he fought against Jake Paul in May, with whom he planned to fit him. Jermall Charlo and Bruno Surace are the two options for May 4.
Canelo’s recent opponents
Edgar Berlanga
Jaime mungiaa
Jermell Charlo
John Ryder
None of them is the latest talent in 168. Canelo’s argument that he is fighting against ‘real fighters’ is not entirely valid. He followed his record and took more easily opponents while avoiding David benavidez and several other talented fighters at 168. He did not try to reform Dmitri Biblical after losing to him.
Crawford: A novelty match?
Canelo’s fight against Welterweight Terence Crawford during Turki’s event on September 13 is not seen as a real battle. It fits into the category of a alien battle Because Crawford is three divisions under Canelo in size, weak, old, and very poor in his recent debut at 154 against Israil Madrimov.
He was out of the fight in that battle, hit hard, and Madrimov landed the cleaner shots with more power. He did not win just because he was the B side.
‘Hey guys, don’t pay attention to this YouTuber. I only fight with real fighters. Don’t be wasted with Canelo, ”Canelo said on Ring Magazine X, responding to Jake Paul’s early remark on social media, saying that he had dived him and owned a ‘slave’. ‘
“Canelo Alvarez got me, Jake Paul X today. “You can’t have the biggest battle of 2025 without my name being involved. When all your events lose tank and money. “
‼ ️ Outing for the ring: Canelo álvarez sends a message to his fans and to Jake Paul. pic.twitter.com/YYGYB3F1W5Q
– Ring Magazine (@ringmagazine) February 8, 2025
Last updated on 02/07/2025