22.5 C
New York
Sunday, July 13, 2025

Can Sam’s Samit Costco? We tested Mark of 3-cow members versus Kirkland+ performance


When Costco’s Kirkland signature Ball golf The shelves of the first hit warehouses, she got the storm golf world. Here was a urethan-covered ball for less than $ 20 in the dozen-something that industry experts considered impossible until the retail giant made it happen. While the three-part bids that followed-now in their fourth generation-have never lived in the performance of the legendary original, they have kept a cult following largely because of their crazy value proposal.

The Costco Loyal Followers Legion knows training: Grab a hot dog and a dozen golf balls for what most brands charge for four sleeves. Buya wholesale for the benefit of it and, for years, Kirkland has dominated the space below $ 20 urethane almost unworthy-just because practically no one else was playing in that sandbox.

But now there is competition in the depot alleys.

Summer member Mark: Alternative for Alternative?

Recently, we published data showing how the new Kyrkland+ performance is accumulated against Tixist Pro v1. What we didn’t tell you is that at the same time, we tested another challenger: Ball golf of Sam’s member Club Mark Pro Series. Today, we are comparing the performance of golf balls from the biggest names in wholesale goods. How strange is this?

Since the beginning of the costco, they essentially own the ultrasteller urethranium category. With the Sam’s entry into the quarrel, we wanted to see how this top warehouse compared to what has become the de facto gold standard on the budget -friendly golf balls. Think about it as rossery chicken… Okay, another rotisserie chicken, but for your golf bag.

The question is not whether none of these balls will destroy Pro V1 – they will not be. The question is: In the battle for the repository of the warehouse, which retailer makes the ball the best golf?

Let’s dig into data.

In relation to the test

To execute the test, We have partned with CoolclubsOne of the most respected names in the club’s adaptation and robot testing. Most of the test was performed outside on the Sunridge Canyon Golf Club in Arizona.

The data was collected with washcloth (drivers and cuffs) and Gcquad (wedge).

While the largest test will be done at three speeds, for this lesser test the driver’s speed was set at 100 mph. The cuffs were tested at 81 km per hour while the wedge test was created to repeat a wide stroke of about 40 yards.

Hot from the meters

Before returning the test into the robot, we received some quick measurements in our ball lab meters. Note that the sample size is slightly smaller than what we would usually run for the ball lab. We just wanted to get a general idea of ​​compression, weight and diameter.

Compress

Weight

As was the case in our previous test, there was nothing especially evident in the weight measurements of any of the balls. Kirkland+ performance was again a little heavier, but both fell well within the limits of the USA rules.

Diameter

  • Likewise, Kyrkland Performance+ was, on average, the largest of the two cannons.
  • The Sam member’s sign was smaller even though I would say that both would reasonably fall at the biggest end of the tournament.

Consistency

Again, noting that our sample size was a little smaller, Kirkland was a little more durable in the entire table, but I can’t say in good faith saying that it offers a understandable advantage of quality.

With that off the road, let’s see what happened when we hit the golf balls.

Driver data

ball Speed The angle of the beginning The rate of rotation Maximum height Deduction angle Yard Yard
Kirkland+ performance 145.04 13.28 2,857 85.14 34.60 239.82 267.75
Sam member sign 144.64 13.06 2,829 90.54 36.58 239.04 264.52

jquery (document) .ready (function () {var mgstablepressrowClocked = false; jquery (document) .on (‘click’, ‘#table-490 tr td’, function (e) {if (e.target.nodename == “) //console.log.

Observations:

  • The ball speeds were relatively close to Kyrkland that produced about 1/2 MPH more ball speeds on average.
  • The Sam member’s sign started slightly lower as it produced less rotation.
  • Visible, despite the low starting start, Sam’s ball produced a higher peak trajectory.
  • According to the numbers, Kirkland rotated a note more than the summit ball, but the changes are not important.
  • Kirkland also brought Samin to the transmission and total distance with the significant difference in the latter is likely to be attributed to the fastest angle of the origin of the member’s sign.

Driver’s distribution and durability

Driver Distribution: Mark of Summ Member against Kyrkland Performance+

Observations:

While the wind cannot be completely excluded as a factor, Kirkland+ performance produced the strongest strict distribution with a significant amount.

7-Hokuri data

ball Speed The angle of the beginning The rate of rotation Maximum height Deduction angle Yard Yard
Kirkland+ performance 117.57 19.24 4,951 101.10 48.38 167.41 176.93
Sam member sign 117.58 19.11 4,714 99.41 47.42 168.22 178.92

jQuery (document) .ready (function () {var mgstablepressrowClocked = false; jquery (document) .on (‘click’, ‘#table-4ore td’); jQuery (mgstablepressrowlink) .attr (“href”);

Observations:

  • At the 7-and-end shots, the ball speeds were practically identical. This is not surprising given the similar compression of the two balls.
  • Kirkland produced more than 200 rpm additional rotation, flew higher and landed slightly steep, which explains the advantage of the small distance for the Sam ball.

Getting the wide things here is that Sam Mark Pro Series 2 members and New Kirkland Performance+ are more similar in performance than kirkland and pro -V1 titerist.

Distribution and consistency 7-Herkuri

Distribution 7-Iron: Mark of Summ Member against Kyrkland Performance+

Observations:

  • While it can be difficult to determine by the form of the ellipses, the Sam member’s sign produced a small distribution area (7.4%).

Wedge

ball Speed The angle of the beginning The rate of rotation Maximum height Deduction angle Yard Yard
Kirkland+ performance 43.60 35.93 5,566 22.43 41.85 36.78 41.83
Sam member sign 43.13 36.52 5,306 22.43 42.25 36.13 41.18

jquery (document) .ready (function () {var mgstablepressrowClocked = false; jQuery (document) .on (‘click’, ‘#table-478 tr td’, function (e) {if (e.target.nodename == “) //console.log.

Observations:

  • Despite the low -speed impact, Kirkland produced nearly 1/2 MPH more ball speed, while it began nearly 1.5 degrees lower.
  • Kirkland ball produced approximately 250 rpm more rotation.
  • The transfer numbers and total distance were similar even though there were some changes in the way those numbers were achieved.

Distribution and durability of the wedge

Observations:

The graph rate blows the differences between the balls.

  • Even with permission for small numbers, the Kirkland ball was more consistent from front to back.
  • Sam’s ball was a little stronger from left to right even though you would be with hard pressure to find a significant change beyond the highest rate of Kirkland ball rotation.

Which one is better?

As with most things in golf, it depends on what you are looking for.

If you are following the value, both Kirkland AND Mark’s balls of members Submit a lot of noise for the turkey. They are covered with urethane, provide reasonable performance and cost about half (or less) than a dozen pro v1s.

But when we dig into numbers, the Kirkland ball shows some clear advantages, especially outside.

With the driver, Kirkland posted better distance and stronger distribution which means more predictable performance and less losses. The low initial boot of the summit ball, paired with higher peak height (and what we believe will prove to be above the average rotation rates for the category), suggests a ball that can fight in wind conditions.

With handcuffs, the member’s sign was slightly stronger in terms of distribution area, but changes in rotation, height and distance were minimal.

While the Kirkland distribution graph is a little lighter in the eye, the wedges were a equilibrium no statistically significant in performance or consistency.

It is also noteworthy that while both balls were reasonably rotating, Kirkland tends to rotate one more touch in all clubs that can suit players who want a little more power stop in green.

Ultimately

None of these balls are perfect and they are not supposed to be. The perfect ball does not exist, but if you are looking for a low -cost urethrane option that holds strangely well from tee to Green, Kirkland+ performance It still holds its own as a category landmark. While I wish to have more divisions between these two value options, Mark Pro Series 2 of the member is a worthy challenger. This said, based on this data, the original warehouse ball still has an advantage.

office Can Sam’s Samit Costco? We tested Mark of 3-cow members versus Kirkland+ performance first appeared in MygolfSSS.



Source link

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest Articles

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -