Should the modest results of the GB & NI team worldwide champions? Some interesting threads can be found on the website of the British Athletics Statistics.
2003
As with most statistics, you can argue in any way. Critics can point to Botswana, Tanzania and Ecuador over the top of Britain on the medal table. But more positive and optimistic fans say that Britain is in the final of 66 points in the table with Germany (with preconditions to the eighth-place).
Britain was not the only nation to take the overthrowing championship in Tokyo. The British won three silver and two bronze medals, but Ethiopia won only for four years after recycling the medals table.
Moreover, Poland won one solo silver medal. Over the years, Britain has won a athletic superpower, but one point of politics of Leo Nugaud’s most important gold politeness.
As the former head coach of Uka Max Jones loved: “One day the gold medal holds the press.”
The British head coach of the 1996 Olympic Games Malcolm Arnold revealed this in a painful style when his team was criticized for winning six medals, none of whom was gold in Atlanta games.
Dave Kolins, director of the Cucumber Performance of 2005-2008, was put under such pressure and left his role in Helsinki and the modest champion of the world.
Britain generally won one gold and eight medals at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games, which, in the person of the person, seemed very bad, but they quickly approached the Olympic Games, and the collins were replaced by Charles Van community. The results of the GB teams have improved over time, but because of the knowledge, among other things, the Russians use doping.
Of course, the current head coach of Uka, Paula Dan, should not be very irritated for its role. In the world of Budapest, Britain won only two years. Last year, the British team also enjoyed its best results at the Olympics for 40 years in Paris for 40 years.
In order to be fair, the lesson of 2025 has also died with bad luck. After warming up Molly Kuder’s coward injury, Housing Josh Kerry’s calf injury in his 1500 m semi-finals, Emil Kerbianz, suddenly placed in the last stages of the marathon.
Relays that are so often a happy hunting basis for British athletes were quite catastrophic in Tokyo, which was also summed up by Men’s 4x100m Baton Bungle.
The sponsor of the new team Novuna will want to make better results in her debut. There have been worse performances in the past, as seen below.
British medals in world champions
Event / Gold / Silver / Bronze
Tokyo 2025 – 0, 3, 2
Budapest 2023 – 2, 3, 5
Eugi 2022 – 1, 1, 5
Doha 2019 – 2, 3, 0
London 2017 – 2, 3, 1
Beijing 2015 – 4, 1, 2
MOSCOW 2013 – 3, 1, 3
DAEGU 2011 – 3, 3, 2
Berlin 2009 – 2, 2, 3
Osaka 2007 – 1, 1, 4
Helsinki 2005 – 1, 0, 2
Paris 2003 – 0, 1, 2
Edmonton 2001 – 1, 0, 1
SEVILLE 1999 – 1, 4, 2
Athens 1997 – 1, 4, 1
Garenburg 1995 – 1, 3, 1
Stuttgart 1993 – 3, 3, 4
Tokyo 1991 – 2, 2, 3
Rome 1987 – 1, 3, 4
Helsinki 1983 – 2, 2, 3
The primary championships are the same, whether the athletics of Great Britain are growing or falling. There are many ways to judge, but one method is to view the website of the owner of the governing body, the capacity of 10 to offer suggestions.
When the strength of 10 was created in 2006. It was believed to try to improve this “10th best sign” of each club or region to improve standards. Therefore, the name of “Strength of 10”.
The next year’s strength marks its 20th anniversary. So it is interesting that you have been looking at the 10th best signs since 2006, compared to 2025.
Remember that the 2025 season is not over, although it is fair to believe that there will be no very influential performances in October.
Super shoes and spots have ruined the rankings in the events implemented, especially on longer distances.
Finally, we hoped that the criteria were really resurrected in British athletics in the last 19-20 years, but they will also rise all over the world.
Here are the statistics …
10th best performances in British Athletics in 2006 and 2025 with a superior sign
Men
100m
2006 – 10.34 | 2025. 10.17
200 m
2006. 20.98 | 2025. 20.70
400 m
2006 – 46.67 | 2025. 45.80
800 m
2006. 1: 47.20 | 2025. 1: 45.01
1500 m
2006. 3: 41:14 | 2025. 3: 35.22
5000 m
2006. 13: 54.66 | 2025. 13: 29.10
10,000 m
2006. 30. 07.11 | 2025. 28. 52.25
Marathon
2006. 2:19:16 | 2025. 2:14:46
110m obstacles
2006, 14.12 | 2025. 14.18
400m obstacles
2006. 51.52 | 2025. 50.48
3000m steeplechase
2006. 8: 47.86 | 2025. 8: 49.86
Jump high
2006 – 2.16 m | 2025. 2.11 m
Polar folder
2006. 5.10 m | 2025. 5.10 m
Jump
2006. 7.45 m | 2025. 7.65 m
Triple
2006 – 15.38 m | 2025. 15.37 m
Shot
2006 – 16.78 m | 2025. 16.21 m
Investigation
2006 – 52.71 m | 2025. 55.07 m
Hammer
2006 – 62.42 m | 2025. 66.08 m
Tape
2006 – 67.94 m | 2025. 69.45 m
20km race walk
2006. 1:41:20 | 2025: No signs
Dechatlon
2006. 6659 | 2025. 7161
Women
100m
2006. 11.57 | 2025. 11:26
200 m
2006. 23.56 | 2025. 22.98
400 m
2006. 53:46 | 2025. 52.08
800 m
2006. 2: 02.79 | 2025. 2: 00.81
1500 m
2006. 4: 12.76 | 2025. 4: 06.45
5000 m
2006. 16: 04.46 | 2025. 15: 10.35
10,000 m
2006. 34. 35:16 | 2025. 33. 12.54
Marathon
2006. 2:41:48 | 2025. 2:33:31
100m obstacles
2006. 13.79 | 2025. 13.41
400m obstacles
2006. 58.74 | 2025. 59.39
3000m steeplechase
2006. 10: 24:29 | 2025. 10: 10.88
Jump high
2006 – 1.80 m | 2025. 1.81 m
Polar folder
2006 – 3.90 m | 2025. 3.87 m
Jump
2006. 6.24 m | 2025. 6.42 m
Triple
2006 – 12.82 m | 2025. 12.73 m
Shot
2006. 14.27 m | 2025. 15.02 m
Investigation
2006 – 47.64 m | 2025. 46.77 m
Hammer
2006 – 57.31 m | 2025. 59.58 m
Tape
2006 – 46.68 m | 2025. 47.92 m
20km race walk
2006. 2:07:16 | 2025: No signs
Heptlon
2006. 5299 | 2025. 5470
Some quick gatherings from this simple survey. First of all, in 2025, men’s 14 events were better than in 2006, but six events have been signed by these year’s signs since 2006.
1725 events in Athletics in Athletics are better than in 2006, but there are three events in 2006 that are better today.
In general, female athletes have been improving more in the last two decades. Today, “Running Events” today are better today than they were in 2006, some of which have improved significant amounts of no doubt because of a shoe.
In general, the picture is a steady progress. So don’t be surprised when the next year British gold is in a hurry to the European home land champions in Birmingham.
