In a controversial moment during the fourth Test between them Australia and India At the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG), Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal was dismissed in controversial circumstances, prompting reactions from both captains, Rohit Sharma and Pat Cummins. The incident has sparked a wide-ranging debate about the use of technology in cricket and its implications for decision-making.
Controversial dismissal of Yashasvi Jaiswal
Drama ensued on Day 5 when Jaiswal was batting on 84 runs. He tried to get a short delivery from Cummins which was caught by the keeper Alex Carey. First, the referee on the field Joel Wilson Jaiswal ruled that he was not left out after the request made to keep him behind. However, Cummins opted for a Decision Review System (DRS) review, leading to a lengthy examination by a third umpire. Sharfuddoula Saikat.
Despite the snickometer showing no bounce to indicate an edge, Saikat overturned the on-field decision based on visual evidence indicating a deflection. The decision left Jaiswal visibly distraught as he walked off the field, with many fans in the stadium expressing their displeasure by chanting “cheats”.
Rohit Sharma’s reaction
Indian captain Rohit, reflecting on his dismissal, emphasized that technology should be used effectively. “Look, I don’t know what to make of it because the tech wasn’t showing anything. With the naked eye, it seemed that he had touched something. “I don’t know how the referees want to use the technology, but to be fair, he touched the ball.” Rohit said. “But again, it’s not 100 percent with the technology we all know.”
Pat Cummins’ perspective
In contrast, Australian skipper Cummins defended the third umpire’s decision, stating that Jaiswal had lowered his head after hitting the ball. “Oh look, I think it was obvious that he hit. We heard a sound, saw a deflection, so we were pretty sure he hit. As soon as we refer to him, you can see him put his head down and admit to hitting. You can see him hitting it on the screen.” Cummins noted.
“Ultra edge… I don’t think anyone really believes it, and it hasn’t shown much, but luckily there’s enough other evidence to show that it’s clearly out there.” he added.
Jaiswal’s dismissal was crucial as India struggled to recover from the loss of its top-order corps. After Jaiswal’s exit, India slumped to 155 for 6 from 140, resulting in a 184-run defeat and Australia taking a 2-1 lead in the five-match series.