Being shocked that a nail costs $400 or even $500 is no longer realistic in today’s world. But every now and then, a club comes along that crosses that threshold into four-figure territory. At that point, we think it’s worth asking some tougher questions.
The Golfyr Maker Tour costs $1,062 and was part of our setup Hammer Throw Test 2026. Let’s take a deeper look at what it is, who it’s for, and whether you can justify the money.
How we test
MyGolfSpy’s most requested testing is powered by:
- Titleist Pro V1 Golf Balls are a key component in testing. Every shot in Most Wanted uses these golf balls. They have long been the gold standard in golf ball quality and are the only ball we trust to complete our most demanding testing.
- GC Quad Forecast – Prediction is the gold standard in camera-based launch monitor technology because it produces data we can rely on with every shot. For this test, our GC Quads captured 13,680 shots.
- SIGPRO Premium of the Indoor Golf Shop – All of our testing is done indoors at our facility in Yorktown, Va. With every test, our screens take an absolute beating. Thus, we need high-quality and durable impact displays to handle the workload. SIGPRO Premium exceeds our expectations.
- UNRL clothing – Official staff apparel partner of MyGolfSpy, we rely on UNRL to keep staff comfortable and focused on providing world-class testing.
What is the Golfyr Mug Maker?
Golfyr is a Swiss golf brand that probably isn’t on your radar yet. The Maker Tour is their flagship putter co-developed with Sergio Garcia and built in Switzerland to specifications that Garcia is said to have personally signed off on.
The head is tungsten weighted and has an MOI of 7,100 which is on the higher end of what you will find in the hammer category.
How we tested it
Each player in this test was hit by real players at short, medium and long distances, generating a total of 18,524 shots worth of data. We used PuttView’s tracking system to capture percentage, average miss distance, velocity deviation, and direction deviation for each putt. The title ranking metric is PuttView Handicap (PV HCP) which translates overall putting performance into a Strokes Gained style number. The more negative a score, the better the shooter performs.
What the data shows
Short shots
This is where the Maker Tour makes its strongest case. With a short PuttView handicap of -5.0, he sits at the top of the field ahead of every Scotty Cameron, Odyssey and PING tested. Putters that did well on short shots were Bettinardi BB 7.0 (-7.4), Bettinardi BB 6.0 (-6.5), Sausage Golf Boudin Noir (-6.2), Tour Edge Wingman 800 Series (-6.0) and Cleveland HB Soft 2 (-5).
At four feet, she posted a 54.7 percent rate which is the highest in the test against a field average of 49.5 percent.
Medium shot
The picture changes in the middle distances. An average PuttView handicap of -2.0 keeps him on the right side of the book, but a significant portion of the field has outperformed him here. Shooters like Ben Hogan BHM03 (-5.9), Edel Array F-1 (-4.8) and Ben Hogan BHM02 (-4.0) pulled well.
Her mid-range production rate of 25.3 percent sits just above the field average of 24.1.
Long shots
Long distance data is the hardest to ignore at this price. A PuttView Long Handicap of -6.2 is a reasonable number in isolation, but roughly half the field scored more negatively from distance, including several shots that cost a fraction of the Maker Tour prize money. His production rate of 17.0 percent from long range fell just short of the field average of 18.2. If the delay setting is where you tend to throw pictures, the data doesn’t support the $1000 price tag.
Who is this carrier for?
The data is pretty consistent in what it tells you. The Maker Tour is at its best on short shots and becomes less competitive as the distance increases. If your short put—the four- to eight-foot range—is where you’re losing putts, there’s a real performance argument here. If your biggest problem is controlling distance and setting delays, Maker Tour likely won’t solve that problem. There are options in the test that may have a lower price.
Is it worth $1062?
In short shots, the Golfyr Maker tournament outperformed most of this field, including players with significantly more brand recognition.
What you’re paying for beyond performance is Swiss manufacture, a history of co-development with one of the game’s best players, and a shooter that really stands out in a market full of similar-looking hammers. Whether this is worth the premium is a personal call.
Take a look at our full hammer blow results here: The best hammer throwers of 2026.
