Keegan Bradley uses the Aimpoint Green Reading Technique at the 2024 BMW championship.
KEYUR KHAMAR/PGA Tour through Getty Images
With the debate over the Slow Play Raging, the former US Open Lucas Glover champion recently made a bold suggestion to help: stopping the goal setting technique. Now the inventor of the popular reading process popular among the good is hitting in Glover to protect its creation.
In a late January episode of “The Lucas Glover Show” on Sirius XM PGA Tour’s radio, Glover said that Aimpoint “should be stopped” Because of its effects on the slow game.
But he also claimed without evidence that statistics show greening process – who requires a player to tighten his place of placement in many points in green – does not help in favor to improve their placement.
‘Must be stopped:’ US OPEN The winner bursts the green reading technique
Seduce
Are those comments with which Aimpoint Mark Sweeney’s inventory and founder were over long an interview with bunked.co.uk.
“It was a false statement. I think it was a malicious statement, ”Sweeney said bunked.co.uk. “And I think (Glover is) will have to walk again and attract it in the near future.”
Sweeney said that while he realized that some people do not like Aimpoint, Glover’s criticism was simply inaccurate based on data.
“Lucas was actually wrong when he said he never helped anyone, it’s crazy,” Sweeney said.
Sweeney then withdrew from a list of specific players who have benefited from Aimpoint’s approval in 17 years since debuting on the tournament. Those players include Adam Scott, Lydia KO, Stacy Lewis and Scott McCarron.
Collin Morikawa fires again in harsh criticism of pro for setting the technique
Kevin Cunningham
“And it’s not my opinion, these are lap data,” Sweeney argued. “If you know when a player started Aimpoint, and you look before and after, 90 to 95% improve.”
Sweeney also hit again in Glover’s argument that Aimpoint slows down the game, a point Collin Morikawa did recently.
“It is a false criticism of pretending to be slow. All I can say is that people who make an Aimpoint read and then make a traditional reading are slower, but there is no reason to make them both. We don’t learn it, ”Sweeney said.
For a complete separation of what is Aimpoint and how it works, View Adam Scott’s explanation for the controversial technique here.
“>>
